1466
466 and H.K. tels Nos 292, 326, 424,
This correspondence makes it clear that at this
stage
The Brunk
Was
ан
a
employee of the H.K. Garst. not
The next informatio
H.K. Saving
no
a
(18) (10) (13) (19).
salaried adviser i.e.
consultant.
we
had was
contained in
(21)
744 of the 29th June, 1957, which
stated that Brunt had finished his work in H.K.,
100
had presented
a
preliminary report
a
had returned
hell
to the U.K.
G
" with instructions to draw
estimates of the cost of the scheme'
first month in Lundar he was
#1
up
For his
to continue
as
salaried employee of the H.K. Goot, but that arrangements and have to be made for his subsequent payment which end probably have to be made "through whichever firm of consulting he next attaches himself to. He has
engineers
suggested that in this case
On
payments shd be hused
the practice of the Association of Consulting Engineers."
We were asked to make these arrangements.
Before
a
hold
me
we
received
wak this
that after
as
to be engaged of the scheme wś take
saving,
me month
Brunt called on me
in the old basis he was
consultant, that the initial preparation
2-3 months, that he might then have to reton to H.K. to quin approval of the
general scheme
details.
that he wo then return here to work out
He ed not estimate the cost of the scheme
but thought it might Subsequently, he sent us
Barnelt, which more
so for
as
run to
of
copy
less confirms the above mata
min. 2/7.
3 -400,000.
of
a letter signed by
[enc. 1(22)]
The
his remuneratim is concerned
A
K
in that
that [enc.
Page 100Page 101
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.